Maintenance and development of [Tcl]'s core is itself a substantial project, one which 
certainly benefits from disciplined use of [SCM] tools.  As of July 2003, [SourceForge]
has hosted this work (for several years?).  There's sentiment to relocate Tcl's home to
another technology ''and'' another site, because [[enumerate reasons]].  As [CL] 
understands matters, [BitKeeper], [Bugzilla], and [CVSTrac] are under consideration.

----

[PT] 16-Jul-2003: Bugzilla provides an extremely good bug tracking system that is highly configurable and significantly
better than the SourceForge trackers with low software overheads ([Apache], [MySQL[ and [Perl] :( ).

I don't see much need to move away from a [CVS]-based version control system.
Bitkeeper is more efficient but imposes a barier to
new contributors (ie: it costs). The Tcl code base really isn't large enough to demand
the increased efficiency over CVS. Any new site should continue to provide pserver- and [ssh]-based cvs
access and should probably continue to provide cvsweb or equivalent web browsing of the cvs tree.

----