A basekit is another term for tclkit-like technology. Since the creator of Tclkit asked that developers not add or remove extensions from a tclkit file, one might assume that if they call their file a basekit then they could, in theory, offer variants. Perhaps dqkit might be called a basekit? The first use of the term I recall was from ActiveState.
List of Basekits (with comparison to Tclkit)
[anyone want to build a table that lists what extensions are in each basekit?]
ActiveTcl | Tclkit | Tclkit Lite | Tclkit Mobile | Tclkit-X11 | TixTclKit | Dqkit | kbskit | KitCreator | Wize | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tcl | 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, | 8.4, 8.5 | 8.4, 8.5 | 8.4, 8.5 | 8.5, 8.6 | 8.4, 8.5, 8.6 | ||||
Tk | same as Tcl | same | same | same | same | same | ||||
Thread | 2.6.5 (opt) | no | 2.6.3 | 2.6.5 | 2.6.5 (opt) | |||||
Incr Tcl | no | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | |||||
Metakit | 2.4.9.7 | 2.4.9.7 | 2.4.9.2 | 2.4.9.7 | 2.4.9.7 | |||||
TclVFS | 1.4.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4.1 | 1.3 | |||||
Registry | Windows | same | same | same | same | yes | Windows | same | same | same |
DDE | Windows | same | same | same | same | yes | Windows | same | same | same |
Tclx | no | no | ??? | no | no | |||||
PWB (8.4) | 1.1 | 1.1 | no | no | 1.1 | |||||
Rechan | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | no | 1.0 | |||||
Zlib | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | no | 1.1 | |||||
TDBC | no | no | no | 1.0b1 | no | |||||
BLT | no | no | 2.4 | no | no | |||||
Tix | no | no | no | no | no | |||||
SQLite | no | no | 2.0 | no | no | |||||
SQLite3 | no | no | 3.3.4 | no | no | |||||
TclODBC | no | no | no | no | no | |||||
Expect | no | no | 5.43.0 | no | no | |||||
Itk | no | no | 3.3 | no | no | |||||
Iwidgets | no | no | 4.0.2 | no | no | |||||
mysqltcl | no | no | 2.0 | no | no | |||||
Pgtcl | no | no | 1.5 | no | no | |||||
tbcload | no | no | 1.4 | no | no |