[Larry Smith] posted in [the comp.lang.tcl newsgroup]: ''Is it possible to assign to a $b �s value and to b $a �s value without using a third variable? Is there a function to do so?'' Why not just: let a b @= $b $a Which, by the way, also allows: let a b c = 1 ;# this sets a b and c to 1 let a b c = 1 + 4 ;# "=" uses expr to process the value to assign let a b c += 1 ;# computed assignments are allowed, +-*/&| supported let a b c := info commands ;# uses eval to process right side let a b c @= 1 2 3 ;# "hoisting" assignment, foreach replacement let a b c @:= info commands;# uses eval and hoists for assignment let a ++ ;# incr and let a -- ;# decr are supported. ---- package require Tcl 8.2 ;# DGP contribution proc let { args } { if { [llength $args ] == 2 } { if [string equal [ lindex $args 1 ] "++" ] { set result [ uplevel incr [ lindex $args 0 ] ] } elseif [string equal [ lindex $args 1 ] "--" ] { set result [ uplevel incr [ lindex $args 0 ] -1 ] } else { set result [ uplevel set "$args" ] } } else { regexp {([^=:+\-*/&|@]*)([:+\-*/&|@]?)([@]*)=(.*)} $args -> vars op optional rest if ![ info exists op ] { return -code error -errorcode 1 "no valid assignment operator in $args" } switch -- $op { : { if [llength [info commands [lindex $rest 0]]] { set result [uplevel $rest] } else { set result $rest ;# this should always work... } if { "$optional" == "@" } { set max [ llength $result ] set i 0 foreach var $vars { uplevel set $var [ lindex $result $i ] incr i } } else { foreach var $vars { set result [ uplevel set $var \"$result\" ] } } } @ { if { "$optional" == ":" } { set rest [uplevel $rest] } set max [ llength $rest ] if { $max == 1 } { eval set rest $rest set max [ llength $rest ] } set i 0 foreach var $vars { set result [ uplevel set $var [ lindex $rest $i ] ] incr i } } + - - - * - / - & - | { foreach var $vars { set result [ uplevel set $var \[ expr \$$var $op ( $rest ) \]] } } = - default { if { [ catch { set result [ uplevel expr $rest ] } ] } { set result $rest ;# this should always work... } foreach var $vars { set result [ uplevel set $var \"$result\" ] } } } } return $result } ---- [RS] The code fragment (appears twice above) set i 0 foreach var $vars { uplevel set $var [ lindex $result $i ] incr i } seems like it can be replaced by foreach var $vars res $result { uplevel 1 [list set $var $res] } - if [foreach] can do a job once, it might as well do it twice ;-) A variable saved, and possibly safer with the [list] wrapper...