Updated 2012-07-11 11:01:59 by RLE

Clif Flynt desires applicaton control over timing and placement in namespace hierarchy of a package, and ability to load a package multiple times (?)

See http://purl.org/tcl/tip/92.html


Packages as per-interp things is pretty fundamental, hard to change now.

Placement seems to be a namespace issue rather than a package issue. Could a [namespace clone] be an effective solution?

What's the motivation for "lazy" vs. "direct" loading control?